Judgment:
CWP No.12900 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No.12900 of 2014 Date of Decision : 8.7.2014 Charanjit Kaur ......Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents ..CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ..Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioner..RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this court by way of instant petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari as well as Mandamus.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly states that so far as the challenge to the order dated 18.3.2014 (Annexure P-20) is concerned, he has instructions not to press this petition qua the said relief for the time being.
He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, in case respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the legal notice of the petitioner served upon him, vide Annexure P-22 dated 31.3.2014.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of Sahni Greesh 2014.07.09 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CWP No.12900 of 2014 2 limitation, if any, Director of Public Instructions (S.E.).Punjab-respondent no.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide notice dated 31.3.2014 (Annexure P-22).by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation/legal notice.
With the observations made above, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
8.7.2014 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE Sahni Greesh 2014.07.09 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh