Skip to content


Present: Mr. Rajbir Singh Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Present: Mr. Rajbir Singh Advocate

Respondent

State of Haryana and ors.

Excerpt:


.....singh sidhu present: mr.rajbir singh,advocate for the petitioners.-- harinder singh sidhu, j.(oral) the present petition has been filed under section 482 cr.p.c.seeking direction to respondents nos.2 and 3 to provide protection to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent no.4 and to restrain him from interfering with the matrimonial life of the petitioners.2. it has been averred that the date of birth of petitioner no.1 is 21.06.1994 and date of birth of petitioner no.2 is 25.12.1991 and photostat copies of intermediate education, uttar pradesh and identity card issued by election commission of india, to this effect are attached by them as annexures p-1 and p-2 respectively. 3. it has been submitted that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 13.06.2014. respondent no.4 is opposed to the marriage, as the petitioners had performed the marriage without his consent. the kumar dinesh 2014.06.18 12:36 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court,chandigarh crl.misc. no.m-20772 of 2014 2 petitioners have submitted representation dated 14.06.2014 (annexure p-3) to respondent no.2 seeking protection of their lives.....

Judgment:


Crl.Misc.

No.M-20772 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.

No.M-20772 of 2014 Date of decision:June 17,2014 Anjum and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and ors...Respondents -- CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr.Rajbir Singh,Advocate for the petitioneRs.-- HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.seeking direction to respondents Nos.2 and 3 to provide protection to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent No.4 and to restrain him from interfering with the matrimonial life of the petitioneRs.2.

It has been averred that the date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 21.06.1994 and date of birth of petitioner No.2 is 25.12.1991 and photostat copies of Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh and Identity Card issued by Election Commission of India, to this effect are attached by them as Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively.

3.

It has been submitted that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 13.06.2014.

Respondent No.4 is opposed to the marriage, as the petitioners had performed the marriage without his consent.

The Kumar Dinesh 2014.06.18 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh Crl.Misc.

No.M-20772 of 2014 2 petitioners have submitted representation dated 14.06.2014 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 seeking protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of the private respondent.

4.

After hearing counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the validity of the marriage and the age of the petitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lata Sing v.

State of U.P.And another, 2006(2) SCC (Criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the said issue and take necessary action in accordance with law.

( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) JUDGE1706.2014 dinesh Kumar Dinesh 2014.06.18 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //