Criminal Appeal No.S-532-sb of 2006 Vs. Criminal Appeal No.S-532-sb of 2006 - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

sooperkanoon.com/1152103

Court	Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On	May-27-2014
Appellant	Criminal Appeal No.S-532-sb of 2006
Respondent	Criminal Appeal No.S-532-sb of 2006

Excerpt:

.....getting their statements recorded. the trial court having recorded their statements too came to the conclusion that the compromise was genuinely effected between the parties. 3. considering the nature of offences under which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced and the fact that both parties have compromised the matter, i find that any advers.decision in the appeals would affect their cordial relations. in view of the above, judgments of the trial court which are under challenge before this court stand set aside. the appellants are acquitted of the above charges levelled against them. the bail bonds executed by them stand discharged. both the appeals are allowed. sharma seema 2014.06.17 13:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal appeal no.s-532-sb of 2006 [3].4. copy of the order be placed in the file of the connected case, namely, criminal appeal no.s-750-sb of 2008. may 27, 2014 (m.jeyapaul) seema judge sharma seema 2014.06.17 13:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Judgment:

Criminal Appeal No.S-532-SB of 2006 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.S-532-SB of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: May 27, 2014 Kashmir Singh .....APPELLANT VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT Criminal Appeal No.S-750-SB of 2008 Harjinder Singh ...APPELLANT VERSUS State of Punjab ...RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL.

1.Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest?.

Yes/No PRESENT:Mr.V.K.THAKUR,ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT.

Mr.S.S.CHAUDHARY, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL, PUNJAB.

-*- M.JEYAPAUL, J.(ORAL) 1.

Appellant, Kashmir Singh who was convicted under Sections 323, 382, 411 and 458, IPC, has challenged the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, by Sharma Seema 2014.06.17 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Appeal No.S-532-SB of 2006 [2].preferring Criminal Appeal No.S-532-SB of 2006.

Appellant- Harjinder Singh @ Rajinder Singh who was convicted under Sections 324, 382 and 458, IPC, has challenged the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court by preferring Criminal Appeal No.S-750-SB of 2008.

On the basis of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant in both the matters in the background of the compromise deed filed that the matter was compromised between the parties, the parties were directed to appear before the trial court for getting their statements recorded.

The trial Court having recorded their statements too came to the conclusion that the compromise was genuinely effected between the parties.

Considering the nature of offences under which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced and the fact that both parties have compromised the matter, I find that any adveRs.decision in the appeals would affect their cordial relations.

In view of the above, judgments of the trial court which are under challenge before this Court stand set aside.

The appellants are acquitted of the above charges levelled against them.

The bail bonds executed by them stand discharged.

Both the appeals are allowed.

Sharma Seema 2014.06.17 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Appeal No.S-532-SB of 2006 [3].4.

Copy of the order be placed in the file of the connected case, namely, Criminal Appeal No.S-750-SB of 2008.

May 27, 2014 (M.JEYAPAUL) seema JUDGE Sharma Seema 2014.06.17 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh