Skip to content


Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma Advocate

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt:


.....p-4) already moved by the petitioners in this behalf. in this view of the matter and without going into merits of the claim raised by the petitioners.this petition is disposed of with direction to mohan brij 2014.06.12 14:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm-m-20506 of 2014 -2- respondent no.2 – sr.superintendent of police, ropar (rup nagar) to take appropriate action in accordance with law on representation (annexure p-4) already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.however, it is made clear that petitioner no.2 is less than 21 years and this order will be having no effect on the validity or otherwise of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law. june 12th , 2014 (dr.bharat bhushan parsoon) brij judge mohan brij 2014.06.12 14:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Judgment:


CRM-M-20506 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20506 of 2014 Date of decision: 12th June, 2014 Pooja and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DR.

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioneRs.**** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record affidavits of petitioneRs.The same are taken on record.

The petitioneRs.claiming themselves to be major (petitioner No.1 having been born on 20.1.1994 and petitioner No.2 having been born on 11.11.1994) and averring that they got married at Prachin Shiv Mandir, Panchkula seek protection of their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 7.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners would be satisfied if the Sr.Superintendent of Police, Ropar (Rup Nagar) - respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 6.6.2014 (Annexure P-4) already moved by the petitioners in this behalf.

In this view of the matter and without going into merits of the claim raised by the petitioneRs.this petition is disposed of with direction to Mohan Brij 2014.06.12 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-20506 of 2014 -2- respondent No.2 – Sr.Superintendent of Police, Ropar (Rup Nagar) to take appropriate action in accordance with law on representation (Annexure P-4) already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioneRs.However, it is made clear that petitioner No.2 is less than 21 years and this order will be having no effect on the validity or otherwise of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner No.2 as per law.

June 12th , 2014 (Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon) Brij Judge Mohan Brij 2014.06.12 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //