Judgment:
CRM No.M-19878 of 2014 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M- 19878 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision: June 4, 2014.
Renu and another .....PETITIONER (s) Versus State of Haryana and others .....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioneRs.***** LISA GILL, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioners for protection of their life and liberty as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and other relatives because they are stated to have contracted marriage between themselves on 02.06.2014 against the wishes of the said respondents.
It is contended that the petitioners are major, their dates of birth being 11.05.1994 and 30.6.1989, respectively.
True copies of Adhaar Card of petitioner No.1 and Driving Licence of petitioner No.2 have been appended with the petition as Annexures P1 and P2, respectively.
The photographs of the marriage are also placed on record as Annexure P3.
Petitioner No.1 is Singh Omkar 2014.06.05 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-19878 of 2014 [2].stated to have submitted a representation dated 02.06.2014 (Annexure P4) to respondent No.2 i.e., the Senior Superintendent of Police, SiRs.for redressal of their grievance.
Notice of motion to the Advocate General, Haryana.
On the asking of the Court, Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
Two copies of the petition have been handed over to learned State counsel.
Without commenting upon the age of the petitioners or the validity of their marriage or the validity and genuineness of the certificates appended with the petition, respondent No.2 – the Senior Superintendent of Police, SiRs.is directed to decide the representation dated 02.06.2014 submitted by petitioner No.1 and take appropriate action keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioneRs.It is, however, made clear that this order shall have no effect on the validity of the alleged marriage of the petitioners and neither will any other civil or criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners be barred due to this order.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
( LISA GILL ) June 4, 2014.
JUDGE ‘om’ Singh Omkar 2014.06.05 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh