Skip to content


Rashid P.P. Vs. State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtKerala High Court
Decided On
Judge
AppellantRashid P.P.
RespondentState of Kerala
Excerpt:
.....dist. by adv. sri.p.m.habeeb respondent(s) :- ------------------ state of kerala rep. by station house officer peringome police station, through public prosecutor high court of kerala, ernakulam. by public prosecutor sri.dhanesh mathew manjooran this bail application having come up for admission on0206-2014, the court on the same day passed the following: jvt n.k.balakrishnan, j.-------------------------------- b.a. no.3041 of 2014 ------------------------------- dated this the 2nd day of june 2014 order petitioners are the accused in crime no.284/2014 of peringome police station, kannur district. the offences alleged against them are punishable under secs.143, 147, 148, 427, 294 (b), 506(ii) and 452 r/w 149 of ipc. apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.2......
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE2D DAY OF JUNE201412TH JYAISHTA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3041 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 284/2014 OF PERINGOME POLICE STATION, KANNUR ------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :- ------------------------- 1. RASHID P.P. AGED29YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED KUNHI T.K., PALAKKODAN PEEDIAKAYIL HOUSE, PADENA, NHEKLY P.O.- 670307 KANNUR DIST.

2. NABEEL K. AGED29YEARS S/O. AZEEZ, KOMMADRI HOUSE, (7/510) PADENA, NHEKLY P.O.-670307, KANNUR DIST.

3. NISAR P.C. AGED27YEARS S/O.JAMEELA, PADIKKAL CHULLERI HOUSE, 7/389 PADENA, NHEKLY P.O., 670307, KANNUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------ STATE OF KERALA REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER PERINGOME POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0206-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

-------------------------------- B.A. No.3041 of 2014 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June 2014 ORDER

Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.284/2014 of Peringome Police Station, Kannur District. The offences alleged against them are punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 427, 294 (b), 506(ii) and 452 r/w 149 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.

2. It is stated that the accused persons trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant and damaged the household articles, causing a loss of 5,000/- to the complainant.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that only to deny bail Sec.452 of IPC has been introduced. It is submitted that there were group clashes and crimes were registered against opposite group also.

4. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: The petitioners shall surrender before the B.A. No.3041 of 2014 -:

2. :- Investigating Officer within 10 days from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the learned Magistrate will grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. The accused shall execute a bond for 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b. The accused shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and should appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders. c. The accused shall produce their original passports before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. d. The accused will also file affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they B.A. No.3041 of 2014 -:

3. :- will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. e. The accused shall not leave India without permission of the court. f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. Sd/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J UDGE. //True Copy// P.A. To Judge Jvt


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //