Skip to content


Shish Ram Vs. the State of Haryana and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Shish Ram

Respondent

The State of Haryana and Another

Excerpt:


.....from filing certified copies of annexures a- 1 and a-2. cm stands disposed of. r.a.no.184 of 2014 prayer in this application is for review of the order dated 18.03.2014 passed by this court. it is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that at the time of hearing of the case, he could not bring it to the notice of the court that there is a common seniority for all the class-iv employees maintained jointly when the cases for promotion to the higher post are to be considered whether they are posted in one press or the other. he contends that there are three different government presses where the employees are serving and since the cadre was common, the seniority had to be maintained by the kumar ramesh 2014.04.22 09:47 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh civil writ petition no.5063 of 2014 :2: respondents and the benefit granted accordingly for promotion. he contends that the seniority list circulated by the printing and stationary department, haryana-annexure a-2 reflects the said position, where the petitioner would be senior to the person against whom he is claiming the benefit of stepping up of his pay. in view of the above.....

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.No.4188 of 2014 R.A.No.184 of 2014 & Civil Writ Petition No.5063 of 2014 Date of Decision: April 21, 2014 Shish Ram ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr.Amit Kaith, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL) CM No.4188 of 2014 Exemption granted from filing certified copies of Annexures A- 1 and A-2.

CM stands disposed of.

R.A.No.184 of 2014 Prayer in this application is for review of the order dated 18.03.2014 passed by this Court.

It is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that at the time of hearing of the case, he could not bring it to the notice of the Court that there is a common seniority for all the Class-IV employees maintained jointly when the cases for promotion to the higher post are to be considered whether they are posted in one Press or the other.

He contends that there are three different Government Presses where the employees are serving and since the cadre was common, the seniority had to be maintained by the Kumar Ramesh 2014.04.22 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.5063 of 2014 :2: respondents and the benefit granted accordingly for promotion.

He contends that the seniority list circulated by the Printing and Stationary Department, Haryana-Annexure A-2 reflects the said position, where the petitioner would be senior to the person against whom he is claiming the benefit of stepping up of his pay.

In view of the above submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, the order dated 18.03.2014 is recalled and the main writ petition is taken on board.

Application stands disposed of.

CWP No.5063 of 2014 Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one by improving the pleadings in the writ petition and supporting the claim on the basis of other documents.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

April 21, 2014 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ramesh JUDGE Kumar Ramesh 2014.04.22 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //