Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5568-2014 Date of decision: 11.4.2014 Jitender ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sumer Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Ajay Gulati, DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Sant Ram **** Jitendra Chauhan, J.
By filing the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought regular bail in case FIR No.291, dated 11.12.2011, registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station City Mullana, District Ambala.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR, nor any role has been attributed to him in the alleged crime.
The petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2011.
Nothing is to be recovered from him.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer of the petitioner.
He further submits that the petitioner has actively participated in the murder of Babu Ram.
He further informs that out of 22 witnesses, only four have been examined so far.
The petitioner Shanker Gauri 2014.04.12 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh is also involved in three more cases, out of which, in two cases he has since been acquitted by the trial Court.
Heard.
It is a case of murder.
The petitioner actively participated in the alleged crime.
Earlier the petitioner filed CRM-M-33851-2013, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 8.10.2013.
No fresh ground is made out to grant bail to the petitioner.
Keeping in view the antecedents of the petitioner and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant any discretionary relief to the petitioner.
Dismissed.
However, anything stated herein above shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.
11.4.2014 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) gsv JUDGE Shanker Gauri 2014.04.12 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh