Skip to content


Shan Vs. the State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Kerala High Court

Decided On

Judge

Appellant

Shan

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt:


.....bail.2. it is alleged that the accused persons trespassed into the house of the complainant at 10.30 pm and outraged the modesty of the defacto complainant by pulling the blouse worn by her.3. the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are 24 crimes registered against the son of the defacto complainant, out of which 3 crimes were registered based on the complaint filed by the petitioners herein. it is further submitted that this complaint has been filed only as b.a. no. 1742/2014 -2- a counter blast to the complaint filed by the petitioners.4. considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today. after interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned magistrate. when applied for bail by the accused, the learned magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. the petitioners shall execute a bond for rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any.....

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY,THE17H DAY OF MARCH201426TH PHALGUNA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 1742 of 2014 (C) ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 215/2014 OF BALARAMAPURAM POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT ACCUSED(S)/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED1&2: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHAN AGED30YEARS S/O.SUSEELAN, ANDHIYOOR KUZHIVILA HOUSE, BALARAMAPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 501.

2. SUSEELAN, AGED55YEARS S/O.SATHYANESAN, ANDHIYOOR KUZHIVILA HOUSE BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 501. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1703-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------------------ B.A. No. 1742 of 2014 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of March, 2014 ORDER

Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.215/2014 of Balaramapuram Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. Offences alleged are under sections 452, 294(b), 323, 324 and 354 r/w 34 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.

2. It is alleged that the accused persons trespassed into the house of the complainant at 10.30 pm and outraged the modesty of the defacto complainant by pulling the blouse worn by her.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are 24 crimes registered against the son of the defacto complainant, out of which 3 crimes were registered based on the complaint filed by the petitioners herein. It is further submitted that this complaint has been filed only as B.A. No. 1742/2014 -2- a counter blast to the complaint filed by the petitioners.

4. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: The petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the learned Magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds B.A. No. 1742/2014 -3- of the sureties. b. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer. c. The petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. d. The petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. B.A. No. 1742/2014 -4- e. The petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate. f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //