Skip to content


Sarabjit Kaur and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Sarabjit Kaur and Others

Respondent

State of Punjab and Another

Excerpt:


.....the compromise effected between the parties, whereby they have decided to settle their dispute with an intention to live in peace and harmony. the present case falls in the category of cases, which can be allowed to be settled by way of compromise, in view of the decision of hon'ble the supreme court of india in gian singh v. state of punjab and another, 2012(4) r.c.r.(criminal) 543. in view of what has been discussed hereinabove, the petition is allowed and fir no.26 dated 06.02.2013, for offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-b ipc registered at police station bhikhiwind, district tarn taran and proceedings emanating therefrom are ordered to be quashed, qua the petitioners.(rekha mittal) judge february 24, 2014. davinder kumar davinder kumar 2014.02.26 16:00 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Judgment:


CRM-M-38351-2013 1 IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38351-2013 Date of decision : 24.02.2014 Sarabjit Kaur and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: None for the petitioneRs.REKHA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) The petitioners have prayed for quashing of FIR No.26 dated 06.02.2013, for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”.) registered at Police Station Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran on the basis of compromise dated 01.05.2013 (Annexure P2) effected between the parties.

The parties were directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 02.12.2013 to get their statements recorded with regard to genuineness of compromise.

A report has been submitted by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patti, wherein it has been reported that the statements of the petitioners and complainant have been recorded and the statements made by the parties in the Court reveal that they have voluntarily entered into a compromise with an intention to live in peace and harmony.

Mr.Neeraj Sharma, AAG, Punjab has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and not disputed correctness of assertions of the Davinder Kumar 2014.02.26 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38351-2013 2 petitioners that the matter has been settled by way of compromise between the parties.

Respondent No.2 has not appeared despite service.

I have heard counsel for the State and perused the case file.

There is nothing on record to doubt correctness of the compromise effected between the parties, whereby they have decided to settle their dispute with an intention to live in peace and harmony.

The present case falls in the category of cases, which can be allowed to be settled by way of compromise, in view of the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh v.

State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) R.C.R.(Criminal) 543.

In view of what has been discussed hereinabove, the petition is allowed and FIR No.26 dated 06.02.2013, for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran and proceedings emanating therefrom are ordered to be quashed, qua the petitioneRs.(REKHA MITTAL) JUDGE February 24, 2014.

Davinder Kumar Davinder Kumar 2014.02.26 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //