Skip to content


Antony Raj Alias Tony Vs. State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Kerala High Court

Decided On

Judge

Appellant

Antony Raj Alias Tony

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt:


.....applications.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that married daughter of the first accused eloped with the defacto complainant and on account of that, the petitioner and others attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod, stone etc. petitioner is hit the head of the defacto complainant with a stone.3. learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true. defacto complainant abducted daughter of the first accused. the first accused and others attempted to prevent that. the defacto complainant attacked them. the police registered crime no.1329 of 2013 against the defacto complainant for various offences.4. on hearing both sides it appears to me that the stone (allegedly) used by the petitioner is taken to custody. having regard to the relevant circumstances, i am inclined to b.a.no.596 of 2014 2 grant relief to the petitioner. application is allowed as under: (i) petitioner shall surrender before the officer investigating crime no.1322 of 2013 of the walayar police station on 10.02.2014 at 10 a.m for interrogation. (ii) in case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the officer concerned to direct presence of the.....

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 596 of 2014 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO. 1322/2013 OF WALAYAR POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT -------------------- APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.3 : -------------------------------------------- ANTONY RAJ ALIAS TONY, AGED28YEARS S/O.LATE STANSLAS, BUNGALAVU KALAM, WALAYAR PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT : ---------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0302-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J --------------------------------------- B.A.No.596 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.1322 of 2013 of the Walayar Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 427 and 308 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed the applications.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that married daughter of the first accused eloped with the defacto complainant and on account of that, the petitioner and others attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod, stone etc. Petitioner is hit the head of the defacto complainant with a stone.

3. Learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true. Defacto complainant abducted daughter of the first accused. The first accused and others attempted to prevent that. The defacto complainant attacked them. The police registered Crime No.1329 of 2013 against the defacto complainant for various offences.

4. On hearing both sides it appears to me that the stone (allegedly) used by the petitioner is taken to custody. Having regard to the relevant circumstances, I am inclined to B.A.No.596 of 2014 2 grant relief to the petitioner. Application is allowed as under: (i) Petitioner shall surrender before the Officer investigating Crime No.1322 of 2013 of the Walayar Police Station on 10.02.2014 at 10 a.m for interrogation. (ii) In case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the officer concerned to direct presence of the petitioner on other day/days and time as may be specified by him which the petitioner shall comply. (iii) Petitioner shall co-operate with investigation of the case. (iv) In case the petitioner is arrested, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day. (v) On such production the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: (a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner. (b) Petitioner shall report to the officer investigating the case on every alternate Saturday between 10 a.m and 12 p.m B.A.No.596 of 2014 3 until filing of the final report. (c) Petitioner shall report to the officer investigating the case as and when required for interrogation. (d) Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. (e) Petitioner shall not intimidate or influence witnesses. (vi) In case the petitioner violates any of condition Nos. (b) to (e), bail granted hereby is liable to be cancelled for which the investigating officer may move application before the jurisdictional magistrate (until committal of the case if any, and thereafter before the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned) as held in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala (AIR2006SC100. Sd/- THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. AS /True Copy/ P.A. to Judge


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //