Skip to content


Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja Advocate Vs. Murti Shri Shiv Shakar Mandir - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja Advocate

Respondent

Murti Shri Shiv Shakar Mandir

Excerpt:


.....advocate for the petitioner. **** sabina, j. respondent had filed the petition under section 13 of the haryana urban (control of rent and eviction) act, 1973 seeking ejectment of the petitioner. the learned rent controller vide order dated 24.7.2012 dismissed the ejectment petition. aggrieved against the said order, respondent preferred an appeal and the same was allowed by the appellate authority vide judgment dated 6.12.2013. hence, the present petition by the petitioner- tenant. after arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press the revision petition on merits and prayed that the petitioner be granted six months time to vacate the demised premises as he was in possession of the premises in question for a number of years and the shop in question was the only source of livelihood of the petitioner. in view of submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed on merits. singh gurpreet 2014.02.06 10:16 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh civil revision no.659 of 2014 (o&m) -2- however, the petitioner is granted six months time from today to vacate the.....

Judgment:


Civil Revision No.659 of 2014 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No.659 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.2.2014.

Surender Kumar .......Petitioner Versus Murti Shri Shiv Shakar Mandir .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** SABINA, J.

Respondent had filed the petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking ejectment of the petitioner.

The learned Rent Controller vide order dated 24.7.2012 dismissed the ejectment petition.

Aggrieved against the said order, respondent preferred an appeal and the same was allowed by the Appellate Authority vide judgment dated 6.12.2013.

Hence, the present petition by the petitioner- tenant.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press the revision petition on merits and prayed that the petitioner be granted six months time to vacate the demised premises as he was in possession of the premises in question for a number of years and the shop in question was the only source of livelihood of the petitioner.

In view of submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed on merits.

Singh Gurpreet 2014.02.06 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh Civil Revision No.659 of 2014 (O&M) -2- However, the petitioner is granted six months time from today to vacate the demised premises i.e.on or before 5.8.2014.

This order shall operate subject to filing of an undertaking by the petitioner in this regard before the learned Rent Controller within 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and on making payment of the entire arrears of rent, if any due, within a period of 4 weeks from today and shall also keep on paying the rent of ensuing months up to 5.8.2014 to the respondent on or before 10th of each calendar month.

(SABINA) JUDGE February 05, 2014 Gurpreet Singh Gurpreet 2014.02.06 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //