Skip to content


Shaym Sunder Dhingra, Sole Proprietor Vs. M/S Panchranga Foods and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided On

Case Number

TRA/115 of 2004/TM/DEL (C.O.5 of 2003)

Judge

Appellant

Shaym Sunder Dhingra, Sole Proprietor

Respondent

M/S Panchranga Foods and Another

Excerpt:


(circuit bench sitting at delhi) order (no.189/2009) z. s. negi, chairman: when the case was called today there was no representation from either side. during the last date of hearing also there was no representation from both the sides. registry was directed to send fresh notices to the applicant and the respondents for todays hearing. it appears from the records that the notices have been served on the counsel for the applicant (m/s k.g.bansal and co.) and on the respondent no.2. therefore, in terms of rule 17 of the intellectual property appellate board (procedure) rules, 2003, the rectification application is treated as abandoned.

Judgment:


(Circuit Bench Sitting at Delhi)

ORDER (No.189/2009)

Z. S. Negi, Chairman:

When the case was called today there was no representation from either side. During the last date of hearing also there was no representation from both the sides. Registry was directed to send fresh notices to the applicant and the respondents for todays hearing. It appears from the records that the notices have been served on the counsel for the applicant (M/s K.G.Bansal and Co.) and on the respondent No.2. Therefore, in terms of rule 17 of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003, the rectification application is treated as abandoned.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //