Skip to content


Thuppilakkadan Sulaiman, Hotel Almas, Edakkara and Another Vs. Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, EdakkarA.P.O., Malappuram District - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided On

Case Number

First Appeal Nos. 327, 328, 329, of 09 (Arisen out of order dated 19/05/2009 in Case Nos. OP 182 of 03, 183 of 03 of District Malappuram)

Judge

Appellant

Thuppilakkadan Sulaiman, Hotel Almas, Edakkara and Another

Respondent

Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, EdakkarA.P.O., Malappuram District

Excerpt:


.....hence the bill. 3. the evidence adduced consisted of the affidavit filed by the respective parties; ext.a1, b1 and b2. 4. the matter has been disposed of by a concise and crypt order. the complainant sought for any opportunity to cross examine the opposite party and adduce the required evidence. according to the complainant the forum did not provide sufficient opportunity to adduce evidence. it appears to us that the matter requires a little more detailed consideration. in the circumstances order of the forum is set aside. the forum is directed to permit the both sides to adduce further evidence and dispose of the matter by a considered order. 5. the case will stand posted before the forum on 14/9/09. the forum would issue notice to the opposite parties. office is directed to forward a copy of this order to the forum urgently.

Judgment:


JUSTICE SRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT

The appellant is the complainant in OP.No.182/03 in the file of CDRF, Malappuram. The complaint filed for getting additional bill for Rs.54,000/- cancelled stands dismissed.

2. It is the case of the opposite party KSEB that the APTS detected unauthorized extension from the house of the complainant to the adjust Grace hospital. Hence the bill.

3. The evidence adduced consisted of the affidavit filed by the respective parties; Ext.A1, B1 and B2.

4. The matter has been disposed of by a concise and crypt order. The complainant sought for any opportunity to cross examine the opposite party and adduce the required evidence. According to the complainant the Forum did not provide sufficient opportunity to adduce evidence. It appears to us that the matter requires a little more detailed consideration. In the circumstances order of the Forum is set aside. The Forum is directed to permit the both sides to adduce further evidence and dispose of the matter by a considered order.

5. The case will stand posted before the Forum on 14/9/09. The Forum would issue notice to the opposite parties.

Office is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Forum urgently.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //