Skip to content


Delhi Development Authority Vs. Radha Nagpal and Ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
AppellantDelhi Development Authority
RespondentRadha Nagpal and Ors.
Excerpt:
non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.12072 of2016[@ special leave petition (c) no.36617 of2016[@ special leave petition (c).....cc no.23707 of2016delhi development authority appellant (s) versus radha nagpal & ors. respondent(s) judgment kurian, j.1. delay condoned.2. leave granted.3. the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the award could not be passed on account of the operation of stay. apparently, there is no stay after 2010. if that be so, there is no merit in the contention taken by the appellant that the stay order granted by the court prevented the award being passed within the time permitted under section 11a of the land acquisition act, 1894.4. therefore, this appeal is dismissed. no costs......
Judgment:

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.12072 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.36617 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC NO.23707 OF2016DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT (S) VERSUS RADHA NAGPAL & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the award could not be passed on account of the operation of stay. Apparently, there is no stay after 2010. If that be so, there is no merit in the contention taken by the appellant that the stay order granted by the Court prevented the award being passed within the time permitted under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

4. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. .......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.

[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]. New Delhi; December 14, 2016.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //