Judgment:
Singh Omkar 2013.09.04 11:56 CRM not M-24010 o”
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.
Misc.
not M- 24010 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: September 2, 2013.
Pritam Singh .....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
MRS.SiMs.Dhir Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.
Mr.Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the complainant.
***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no.40 dated 27.05.2013, under Sections 307/452/324/323/148/149 IPC, registered at police station Dera Baba Nanak, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur, Punjab.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Gurdaspur dismissing bail CRM not M-24010 o”
2. application filed on behalf of the petitioner.
It has been contended by learned counsel for petitioner-accused that only allegation against him is that though he was empty handed however, he gave leg blow to injured -Mangal Singh.
It is further contended that he has been continuing in custody since 10.06.2013 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as though challan filed and however, even charge has not been framed so far.
This factual position has not been disputed by learned counsel for the State.
There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.
Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Pritam Singh is allowed.
Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Gurdaspur.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 2, 2013.
JUDGE ‘om’