Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6850 of 2013 Date of Decision : April 02, 2013 Darbara Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH.
Present : Mr.R.S.Rangpuri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.- 1.
Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.
--- Surya Kant, J.
(Oral) Notice of motion.
Ms.Munisha Gandhi, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice.
Let five copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the couRs.of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non- prosecution.
In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage.
The petitioner is resident of village Noorpur Kirpal Ke, Block Sr.Muktsar Sahib, District Sr.Muktsar Sahib.
His grievance is against the notification dated 7.9.2012 (Annexure P-1) of the proposed 'Wardbandi' issued by the Government of CWP No.6850 of 2013 [2].Punjab, whereby wardbandi of ensuing gram panchayat elections is proposed to be carried out for village Noorpur Kirpal Ke, Block & District Sr.Muktsar Sahib.
The petitioner is already said to have submitted his objections firstly vide application dated 31.1.2013 (Annexure P4) followed by a representation dated 20.2.2013 (Annexure P5) but without any response thereto.
We find that somewhat similar controveRs.was raised before us in Civil Writ Petition No.2758 of 2013 (Balwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and otheRs.which was disposed of with certain directions on 08.02.2013.
The present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms and consequently, the Deputy Commissioner, Sr.Muktsar Sahib is directed to decide the objections-cum-representation dated 31.1.2013 & 20.2.2013 said to have been submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week objectively, in accordance with law and uninfluenced of any other consideration.
The final notification shall be issued thereafter only.
Ordered accordingly.
Dasti.
(SURYA KANT) JUDGE $ April 02, 2013 (R.P.NAGRATH) Mohinder JUDGE