Skip to content


Criminal Misc. No.M-34008 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Harvinder Preet Singh Batra and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
AppellantCriminal Misc. No.M-34008 of 2012 (Oandm)
RespondentHarvinder Preet Singh Batra and Others
Excerpt:
.....criminal misc. not m-34008 of 2012 (o&m) surbhie kapoor ......petitioner versus harvinder preet singh batra and others .......respondents criminal revision no.3671 of 2012 (o&m) harvinder preet singh batra and others ......petitioners versus surbhie kapoor and another .......respondents coram: hon'ble mrs.justice sabina present: mr.g.s.kaura, advocate for mr.naresh kaushik, advocate for surbhie kapoor. mr.hemant sarin, advocate, for harvinder preet singh batra and others.mr.satyavir singh yadav, addl.a.g.haryana. **** sabina, j. vide this judgment, above mentioned two petitions would be disposed of as these have arisen out of the impugned order devi anita 2013.08.22 11:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. not m-34008 of 2012 (o&m).....
Judgment:

Criminal Misc.

not M-34008 of 2012 (O&M) 1 Criminal Revision No.3671 of 2012 (O&M) In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision:16.8.2013 Criminal Misc.

not M-34008 of 2012 (O&M) Surbhie Kapoor ......Petitioner Versus Harvinder Preet Singh Batra and others .......Respondents Criminal Revision No.3671 of 2012 (O&M) Harvinder Preet Singh Batra and others ......Petitioners Versus Surbhie Kapoor and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.G.S.Kaura, Advocate for Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for Surbhie Kapoor.

Mr.Hemant Sarin, Advocate, for Harvinder Preet Singh Batra and otheRs.Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Addl.A.G.Haryana.

**** SABINA, J.

Vide this judgment, above mentioned two petitions would be disposed of as these have arisen out of the impugned order Devi Anita 2013.08.22 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.

not M-34008 of 2012 (O&M) 2 Criminal Revision No.3671 of 2012 (O&M) dated 11.9.2012.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.

Admittedly, Surbhie Kapoor is legally wedded wife of Harvinder Preet Singh.

Due to some matrimonial dispute between the parties, Surbhie Kapoor has filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (the Act for short) against her husband and his parents.

The trial Court, vide order dated 9.5.2012 allowed ` 50,000/- per month by way of interim maintenance to Surbhie Kapoor.

Aggrieved against the said order, Harvinder Preet Singh and his parents preferred an appeal.

The Court of appeal, vide impugned order dated 11.9.2012, reduced the quantum of maintenance from ` 50,000/- to ` 25,000/-.

Hence, the present petitions by both the parties.

In the present case, admittedly, Harwinder Preet Singh, is working as Assistant Vice President of Premerica Life Insurance Company DLF.

His monthly salary is ` 1,49,450/-.

He also gets bonus over and above his salary.

Harwinder Preet Singh had shown that his monthly expenses come to about ` 60,000/- per month.

It is also the case of Harwinder Preet Singh that he is maintaining his old parents.

At this stage, there is nothing on record to suggest that Surbhie Kapoor is capable of maintaining herself.

Harwinder Preet Singh is, thus, duty bound to maintain his wife.

Keeping in view the salary of Harwinder Preet Singh, the Devi Anita 2013.08.22 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.

not M-34008 of 2012 (O&M) 3 Criminal Revision No.3671 of 2012 (O&M) court of appeal had erred in reducing the quantum of interim maintenance to ` 25,000/- only.

In fact, in view of the salary earned by Harwinder Preet Singh, it would be just and expedient to allow ` 40,000/- by way of interim maintenance to his wife.

Surbhie Kapoor is expected to lead her life with dignity and as per standard cabale of being maintained by her husband.

Accordingly, Criminal Revision No.3671 of 2012 is dismissed.

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34008 of 2012 is allowed and the impugned judgment passed by the Court of appeal dated 11.9.2012 is modified to the extent that Surbhie Kapoor is entitled to receive maintenance @ ` 40,000/- per month.

It is clarified that anything said above shall have no bearing on the merits of the case pending before the trial Court.

(SABINA) JUDGE August 16, 2013 anita Devi Anita 2013.08.22 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //