Skip to content


“4. Having Heard Learned Counsel for the Parties Vs. State of Punjab and Others --respondents - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

“4. Having Heard Learned Counsel for the Parties

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others --respondents

Excerpt:


.....petitions were disposed of in the light of the following directions:- “4. having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the petitioners have gained sufficient experience as education volunteers.i deem it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions with a direction to the respondents that as and when the respondents review and/or take a fresh policy decision in terms whereof they need to employ education volunteers and/ or teachers with different nomenclature but possessing same qualifications, in that event, the petitioners be given preferential treatment with due weightage to their experience.” notice of motion. on the asking of the court, mr.anupam singla, advocate, who lucky is present in the court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 2013.08.23 13:36 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cwp no.18386 of 2013 (o&m) -2- requisite copies of the writ paper book have been furnished to him. learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the claim raised in the present writ petition can be adequately redressed in the light of the order dated 28.2.2012 at annexure p-6. accordingly, the present.....

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18386 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:

22. 8.2013.

Harpreet Kaur & another --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.

Present:- Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioneRs.*** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J The petitioners have approached this Court praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus for the issuance of directions to grant to the petitioners the benefit in terms of order dated 28.2.2012 (Annexure P-6).passed by this Court in CWP No.14643 of 2011 titled as Davinder Pal Kaur versus State of Punjab & others and other connected petitions.

It would be apposite to notice that the aforementioned writ petitions were disposed of in the light of the following directions:- “4.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the petitioners have gained sufficient experience as Education VolunteeRs.I deem it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions with a direction to the respondents that as and when the respondents review and/or take a fresh policy decision in terms whereof they need to employ Education Volunteers and/ or Teachers with different nomenclature but possessing same qualifications, in that event, the petitioners be given preferential treatment with due weightage to their experience.”

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Anupam Singla, Advocate, who Lucky is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3.

2013.08.23 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP No.18386 of 2013 (O&M) -2- Requisite copies of the writ paper book have been furnished to him.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the claim raised in the present writ petition can be adequately redressed in the light of the order dated 28.2.2012 at Annexure P-6.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 28.2.2012 passed in CWP No.14643 of 2011 (Annexure P-6).Petition disposed of.

(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE August 22, 2013.

lucky




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //