Judgment:
Crl.
Misc.
not M-21273 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.
Misc.
not M-21273 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: August 31, 2013 Vishavbandhu Vikramaditya and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr.Dalel Singh Nain, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1.
Mr.Suresh Ahlawat, Advocate for respondent No.2.
*** Amol Rattan Singh, J.
(ORAL) Pursuant to order of this Court, dated August 08, 2013, the report of the learned Civil Judge (Jr.
Divn.).Kaithal, has been received in Court, stating therein that the petitioneRs.as also respondent No.2 appeared before her and recorded their statements and that, as per her assessment, the compromise has been entered into between the parties without any pressure or undue influence.
The parties are also present in Court today and respondent No.2 has been specifically put a query by this Court as to whether there is any pressure upon her to have entered into the compromise, to which she replied in the negative.
In view of the fact that the matter is essentially a dispute between the mother (respondent No.2) and her son and daughter in law, no purpose would be served in continuing with criminal proceedings.
Therefore, keeping in view the ratio of the law laid down by the Chander Vikas 2013.09.02 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Crl.
Misc.
not M-21273 of 2013 -2- Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, FIR No.393, dated 20.06.2009, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 148, 149 and 452 IPC, at Police Station City, District Kaithal, is hereby quashed, along with all proceedings arising therefrom.
(AMOL RATTAN SINGH) JUDGE August 31, 2013 vcgarg Chander Vikas 2013.09.02 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh