Skip to content


Dr. P.S. Khangar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Dr. P.S. Khangar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


dr.p.s. khangaur versus state 1 w.p.no.17598/2012 2.11.2012 shri r.s.khare, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned govt. adv.for the respondents. petitioner is working as a chief medical and health officer, tikamgarh. on 10.4.2012 he was transferred and inspite of his transfer and relieving it seems that he has not vacated the official quarter allotted to him and therefore, annexure p/3 dated 30.8.2012 has been issued directing him to vacate the quarter and to pay the penal rent. government quarter is allotted to an employee only for a particular period after his transfer and there is nothing brought on record to the notice of this court that in proceeding to direct the petitioner to vacate the quarter any statutory rules or regulations are violated. except for contending that the notice is issued by the incharge c.m.o.and therefore, the same is unsustainable. petitioner has not made out any sufficient ground on the basis of which interference can be made by this court. that apart, no legal right exists in his favour. under such circumstances, i see no reason to interfere into the matter. petition is therefore, dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Judgment:


Dr.P.S.

Khangaur versus State 1 W.P.No.17598/2012 2.11.2012 Shri R.S.Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt.

Adv.for the respondents.

Petitioner is working as a Chief Medical and Health Officer, Tikamgarh.

On 10.4.2012 he was transferred and inspite of his transfer and relieving it seems that he has not vacated the official quarter allotted to him and therefore, Annexure P/3 dated 30.8.2012 has been issued directing him to vacate the quarter and to pay the penal rent.

Government quarter is allotted to an employee only for a particular period after his transfer and there is nothing brought on record to the notice of this Court that in proceeding to direct the petitioner to vacate the quarter any statutory rules or regulations are violated.

Except for contending that the notice is issued by the Incharge C.M.O.and therefore, the same is unsustainable.

Petitioner has not made out any sufficient ground on the basis of which interference can be made by this Court.

That apart, no legal right exists in his favour.

Under such circumstances, I see no reason to interfere into the matter.

Petition is therefore, dismissed.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Mrs.mishra


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //