Judgment:
M.Cr.C.No.15679/2012 5.3.2013 Shri Ajay Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Akhilendra Singh, GA for the State.
Shri Manish Datt, Sr.Counsel with Shri Siddharth Datt for the objector.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.
The complainant lodged the report after coming to her parental house.
It is a matrimonial case, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished.
The applicant has been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 3.1.2013 and he did not misuse the liberty granted to him, therefore, the applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the State and the objector have opposed the application and submitted that applicant used to beat and harass the complainant frequently, therefore, this application is liable to be dismissed.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the annexures filed by the parties.
On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, the facts that it is a matrimonial matter, in which the parties seem to be adamant, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished, the applicant has already been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this Court and there is no report that he misused the liberty granted to him, the order dated 3.1.2013 is hereby made absolute for a period of 60 days only.
In the meanwhile, if the applicant so desires, may apply for regular bail before the competent Court, which shall be considered by that Court, in accordance with law.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB