Skip to content


Ramswaroop Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Ramswaroop Sahu

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


ramswaroop sahu versus state of m.p.& others writ petition no.2902 ”13. 2.2013: shri atul chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned government advocate for the state. against the impugned order passed by tehsildar rejecting preliminary objection of petitioner in the proceedings being held for mutation, petitioner has remedy to file firs.appeal, second appeal under section 44 and revision under section 50 of the m.p.land revenue act, therefore, a petition directly before this court, by-passing the three tier statutory remedy available, is not permissible. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.of statutory remedy available, this petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Judgment:


Ramswaroop Sahu versus State of M.P.& Others Writ Petition No.2902 ”

13. 2.2013: Shri Atul Chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Against the impugned order passed by Tehsildar rejecting preliminary objection of petitioner in the proceedings being held for mutation, petitioner has remedy to file FiRs.Appeal, Second Appeal under Section 44 and Revision under Section 50 of the M.P.Land Revenue Act, therefore, a petition directly before this Court, by-passing the three tier statutory remedy available, is not permissible.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.of statutory remedy available, this petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //