Skip to content


Mohanlal Sahu Alias Indrapal Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Mohanlal Sahu Alias Indrapal Sahu

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....and demand of dowry against the applicant. charge sheet has been filed. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, age of the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.988/2013 7.3.2013 Shri D.K.Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 22.6.2012 in connection with Crime No.61/2012 registered at P.S.Janeh, District Rewa for the offence punishable under sections 498-A, 304-B/34 of the IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

He is father-in-law of deceased Sunita.

He is 72 years old person.

There is general allegation in regard to committing cruelty and demand of dowry against the applicant.

Charge sheet has been filed.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, age of the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //