Skip to content


Sandeep Soni Vs. Shri Sanjay Tiwari - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Sandeep Soni

Respondent

Shri Sanjay Tiwari

Excerpt:


conc no.99/2012 06.03.2013 shri deepak raghuvanshi, advocate for the petitioner. shri mahendra pateriya, advocate for respondent. learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the order passed by this court dated 20.12.2011 in w.p.no.21613/2011, has been complied with. in view of joint submission made by the parties, we find that no further action is required in the matter. the proceedings are closed. however, in case, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondent, rejecting the representation of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to take recours.of the law, as may be available to the petitioner. no order as to costs. (krishn kumar lahoti) (m.a.siddiqui) judge judge psm

Judgment:


CONC No.99/2012 06.03.2013 Shri Deepak Raghuvanshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Mahendra Pateriya, Advocate for respondent.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the order passed by this Court dated 20.12.2011 in W.P.No.21613/2011, has been complied with.

In view of joint submission made by the parties, we find that no further action is required in the matter.

The proceedings are closed.

However, in case, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondent, rejecting the representation of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to take recouRs.of the law, as may be available to the petitioner.

No order as to costs.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge Judge psm




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //