Skip to content


Om Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Om Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


m.cr.c.no.810/2013 6.3.2013 shri sampoorn tiwari, advocate for the applicant. shri r.k.kesarwani, pl for the state. after arguing about 4-5 minutes, counsel has prayed for withdrawal of this application. i am not inclined to give permission to withdraw this application. the application is considered on merits. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicant under section 438 of the cr.p.c.for grant of anticipatory bail. the applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with crime no.437/2012 registered at p.s.omti, district jabalpur for the offence punishable under sections 467, 468, 408 of the ipc. i have perused the case diary. number of witnesses like manish jha, akhilesh pandey, nirbhay singh and bhimrao have stated that they gave money to the applicant and applicant has not deposited the same in the bank, therefore, the applicant has deceived them. considering the statements of aforesaid witnesses and embezzlement of huge amount, in my opinion, it is a case in which custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary, therefore, i do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on anticipatory bail. application is hereby dismissed. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.810/2013 6.3.2013 Shri Sampoorn Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

After arguing about 4-5 minutes, counsel has prayed for withdrawal of this application.

I am not inclined to give permission to withdraw this application.

The application is considered on merits.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail.

The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.437/2012 registered at P.S.Omti, District Jabalpur for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 408 of the IPC.

I have perused the case diary.

Number of witnesses like Manish Jha, Akhilesh Pandey, Nirbhay Singh and Bhimrao have stated that they gave money to the applicant and applicant has not deposited the same in the Bank, therefore, the applicant has deceived them.

Considering the statements of aforesaid witnesses and embezzlement of huge amount, in my opinion, it is a case in which custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary, therefore, I do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on anticipatory bail.

Application is hereby dismissed.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //