Judgment:
M.Cr.C.No.812/2013 6.3.2013 Shri Manish Datt, Sr.Counsel with Shri Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the applicants.
Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.
This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.
Applicant No.1 is in custody since 26.11.2012 and applicant No.2 is in custody since 29.11.2012 in connection with Crime No.192/2004 registered at P.S.Begumganj, District Raisen for the offence punishable under sections 304-B/34, 498-A of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case.
Applicant No.1 is father-in-law and applicant No.2 is uncle-in-law of deceased.
Earlier, the applicants have been released on bail, however, during trial they remained absent before the trial Court and trial Court issued warrant of arrest against them and in compliance of the same, they have been sent to the jail.
The applicants are ready to co-operate in further trial.
The applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail.
Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.
On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicants on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/ trial Court for securing their presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB