Skip to content


Rajju @ Rajkumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Rajju @ Rajkumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....by the applicant. charge sheet has been filed. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation against the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.2854/2013 18.3.2013 Shri Aseem Dixit, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 26.12.2012 in connection with Crime No.638/2012 registered at P.S.Rahatgarh, District Sagar for the offence punishable under sections 377, 450, 506 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.

There is no medical corroboration in regard to unnatural offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant.

Charge sheet has been filed.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation against the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //