Skip to content


Y. Laxmi Narayan Rao Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Y. Laxmi Narayan Rao

Respondent

Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


w.p no.10811/2013 (y. laxmi narayan rao versus state of mp and another) 03.07.2013 heard shri praveen pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. prayer in the petition is to direct the respondent no.2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of sahayak sanchalak. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the aforesaid post but no further steps are being taken and although a representation is pending but inspite of that no order has been passed. in the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent no.2 along with a copy of the order passed by this court today and a copy of the petition. the respondent no.2 shall do the needful for considering the case of the petitioner in accordance with the merit, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible. needful be done within a period of four weeks. with the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp/mct

Judgment:


W.P No.10811/2013 (Y.

Laxmi Narayan Rao versus State of MP and another) 03.07.2013 Heard Shri Praveen Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

Prayer in the petition is to direct the respondent No.2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Sahayak Sanchalak.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the aforesaid post but no further steps are being taken and although a representation is pending but inspite of that no order has been passed.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent No.2 along with a copy of the order passed by this court today and a copy of the petition.

The respondent No.2 shall do the needful for considering the case of the petitioner in accordance with the merit, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible.

Needful be done within a period of four weeks.

With the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp/mct


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //