Skip to content


Sanju Jatav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Sanju Jatav

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....resident of district damoh and there is no possibility of his absconding. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, she be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, gravity of the offence and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.25,000/- (rs.twenty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing her presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.1677/2013 13.3.2013 Shri Y.K.Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 20.1.2013 in connection with Crime No.22/2013 registered at P.S.Kotwali, District Damoh for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294, 324, 326, 506/34 of the IPC read with Section 25B of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

He has no criminal past.

He is permanent resident of District Damoh and there is no possibility of his absconding.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, she be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, gravity of the offence and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/trial Court for securing her presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //