Skip to content


Sunil Kumar Godra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Sunil Kumar Godra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....order dated 25.2.2013 passed in m.cr.c.no.984/2013. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation against the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.2020/2013 13.3.2013 Shri Narayan Dubey, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Punit Shroti, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 20.1.2013 in connection with Crime No.231/2012 registered at P.S.Bajag, District Dindori for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.

He is an employee of Central Bank of India, Branch Gorakhpur.

Co-accused Yogendra Kumar Sori, Branch Manager has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 25.2.2013 passed in M.Cr.C.No.984/2013.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation against the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //