Judgment:
1 M.
Cr.C.No.12637/09.
13.3.2013 .
None for the petitioner.
Shri Vivek Lakhera, learned PL for the respondent/State.
On perusing the earlier order sheet it is apparent that earlier this matter was listed 8.3.2013 and on taking up the matter for hearing no one was present on behalf of the petitioner, consequently the same was adjourned with a direction to list in the next week with a further direction that on account of non-appearance of the petitioner on the next date the petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution.
The same position is today that on taking up the matter no one is present to prosecute this matter.
In such premises it appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the present petition.
Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
(U.
C.Maheshwari) Judge k