Judgment:
Conc.
489/2012 30/4/2013: Shri C.L.Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
Keeping in view the consideration made by the respondents and the proceedings filed considering the case of the petitioner and deciding the claim of the employees as per seniority, not no further action is required to be taken.
Petitioner's case has not been considered as the petitioner has not come within the zone of seniority for regularization.
From the reply filed by the respondents as contained in para 5 and 6 it is clear that claim of the petitioner was placed before the appropriate Screening Committee and based on the seniority action has been taken.
Considering the same, no case is made out for initiating action for contempt.
Instead in case petitioner has any grievance still subsisting he is granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
Accordingly, for the present finding no case for initiating action for contempt, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra