Skip to content


Smt. Archna Harijan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Smt. Archna Harijan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....inspection it was found that the mid-day meal was not being supplied as per the prescribed menu. therefore, the petitioner’s work was allotted to another self-help group of women after obtaining necessary approval in accordance with the guidelines. aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal before the collector, rewa, and thereafter revision before the commissioner but both were dismissed vide orders dated 29.6.2012 and 15.1.2013 respectively. it is in this background the petitioner has filed the present petition. there is enough material to show that the petitioner was not supplying mid-day meal to the school as per the prescribed menu. i am, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the concurrent findings of the authorities below. the petitioner’s work has been allotted to another self-help group essentially keeping the welfare of students in mind. the petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed summarily. judge ps

Judgment:


Writ Petition No.1706/2013 26.2.2013 Shri U.K.Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Shri M.

K.Tripathi, Advocate, for respondent no.4.

Smt.D.K.

Bohre, Government Advocate, for the State.

Heard on admission.

The petitioner is Chairman of self-help group of women which carries on the work of supplying mid-day meal to different Government schools in district Sidhi.

The petitioner was allotted the work of supplying mid-day meal to Government Girls’ Primary School, Chakghat, district Rewa.

However, during inspection it was found that the mid-day meal was not being supplied as per the prescribed menu.

Therefore, the petitioner’s work was allotted to another self-help group of women after obtaining necessary approval in accordance with the guidelines.

Aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Collector, Rewa, and thereafter revision before the Commissioner but both were dismissed vide orders dated 29.6.2012 and 15.1.2013 respectively.

It is in this background the petitioner has filed the present petition.

There is enough material to show that the petitioner was not supplying mid-day meal to the school as per the prescribed menu.

I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the concurrent findings of the authorities below.

The petitioner’s work has been allotted to another self-help group essentially keeping the welfare of students in mind.

The petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed summarily.

JUDGE ps


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //