Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson Vs. United States

Johnson vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-05-1971
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102852

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
401 U.S. 846
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

johnson v. united states - 401 u.s. 846 (1971) u.s. supreme court johnson v. united states, 401 u.s. 846 (1971) johnson v. united states no. 5247 argued march 24, 1971 decided april 5, 1971 401 u.s. 846 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit 138 u.s.app.d.c. 174, 426 f.2d 651, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. the chief justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. mr. justice stewart, with whom mr. justice douglas joins, dissenting. in the petitioner's trial on a charge of rape, the district judge instructed the jury that it could return a verdict of guilty with the death penalty. yet that verdict was constitutionally impermissible in light of this court's decision in united states v. jackson, 390 u. s. 570 . see bailey v. united states, 132 u.s.app.d.c. 82, 86 and n. 3, 405 f.2d 1352, 1356 and n. 3. i think the extreme prejudice arising from this erroneous instruction requires reversal of the judgment of conviction and a remand of this case for a new trial. cf. price v. georgia, 398 u. s. 323 , 398 u. s. 331 -332.

Full Judgment

Johnson v. United States - 401 U.S. 846 (1971)
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. United States, 401 U.S. 846 (1971)

Johnson v. United States

No. 5247

Argued March 24, 1971

Decided April 5, 1971

401 U.S. 846

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

138 U.S.App.D.C. 174, 426 F.2d 651, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.

In the petitioner's trial on a charge of rape, the District Judge instructed the jury that it could return a verdict of guilty with the death penalty. Yet that verdict was constitutionally impermissible in light of this Court's decision in United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570 . See Bailey v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 82, 86 and n. 3, 405 F.2d 1352, 1356 and n. 3. I think the extreme prejudice arising from this erroneous instruction requires reversal of the judgment of conviction and a remand of this case for a new trial. Cf. Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323 , 398 U. S. 331 -332.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial