Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.391of2013 KishorJojo .......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondent CORAM: HONBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.S.K.Deo,Advocate FortheState:Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,A.P.P. 04/Dated:26 th August,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:
1. ThisappealhasbeenAdmittedvideorderdated29thJuly,2013and therecordandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.93of2006wascalled fromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsforsuspensionof sentence.ThisCourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrial courtandwehaveperusedthesame.
2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheevidences on record, it appears that there is a prima facie case in favour of this appellant.Asthecriminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzing theevidencesonrecord,but,sufficeittosaythatlookingtothedepositions ofP.W.1,P.W.2,P.W.3andP.W.4,thereisaprimafaciecaseinfavourofthis appellant.Thereisnoeyewitnessoftheincidentnorthewitnessnamely, RathuNarayanSinghhasbeenexaminedbecausehehadalreadyexpired. Thiswitnesswasinthecompanyofthedeceased.
3. Inviewofthesefactsandalsolookingtotheevidencesonrecord,we hereby, suspend the sentence awarded by the trial court to the present appellant. During pendency of this appeal,the appellant namely, Kishor Jojo,isdirectedtobereleasedonbailuponexecutingbondofRs.10,000/ (Rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfactionoftheAdditionalSessionsJudge,F.T.C.,Simdega,inconnection withSessionsTrialNo.93of2006,ontheconditionthattheappellantshall beavailableasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredbythecourt. (D.N.Patel,J) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) VK/