Skip to content


Chipu Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Chipu Murmu

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt:


.....: mr.pankajkumar,a.p.p. 06/dated:26 th august,2013 perd.n.patel,a.c.j.:1. thisinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredformodificationofthe order passed by this court dated 27th february, 2013. this appellant was enlargedonbailbysuspendingthesentenceuponexecutionofbailbondof rs.10,000/withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthe trial court. a letter has been written by the superintendent, central jail, dumka that the present appellant has no means to give bail bond of rs.10,000/withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount.bothsonsofthisappellant haveexpired.exceptminorgrandson,thereisnorelativeand,therefore,heis unabletogivebailbondandsureties,asdirectedbythiscourtand,therefore, despitetheorderwaspassedinfebruary2013,theappellantisinjail.2. learneda.p.p.appearingonbehalfofthestateisseekingtimetoverify thefactswhichhavebeenstatedintheletterwrittenbythesuperintendent, centraljail,dumka.3. thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon2ndseptember,2013. (d.n.patel,a.c.j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) ajay/

Judgment:


INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.6228of2013 In Cr.(Jail)Appeal(DB)No.1129of2012 ChipuMurmu Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HON'BLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant : Ms.RashmiKumar,AmicusCuriae FortheState : Mr.PankajKumar,A.P.P. 06/Dated:26 th August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.:

1. Thisinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredformodificationofthe order passed by this Court dated 27th February, 2013. This appellant was enlargedonbailbysuspendingthesentenceuponexecutionofbailbondof Rs.10,000/withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthe trial court. A letter has been written by the Superintendent, Central Jail, Dumka that the present appellant has no means to give bail bond of Rs.10,000/withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount.Bothsonsofthisappellant haveexpired.Exceptminorgrandson,thereisnorelativeand,therefore,heis unabletogivebailbondandsureties,asdirectedbythisCourtand,therefore, despitetheorderwaspassedinFebruary2013,theappellantisinjail.

2. LearnedA.P.P.appearingonbehalfoftheStateisseekingtimetoverify thefactswhichhavebeenstatedintheletterwrittenbytheSuperintendent, CentralJail,Dumka.

3. Thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon2ndSeptember,2013. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //