Skip to content


Sakalu Oraon ? Toppo and ors Vs. Raj Kishore Sahu and anr - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Sakalu Oraon ? Toppo and ors

Respondent

Raj Kishore Sahu and anr

Excerpt:


inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi misc.appealno.69of2009 sakaluoraon@toppo&ors. .... .... . appellants versus thenewindiainsuranceco.ltd. .... .... ....respondent coram:honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay fortheappellants :mr.ashutoshanand,advocate fortherespondent :mrs.nishathakur,advocate 16/20.08.2013 i.a.no.6214of2013 itappearsthatduetononcomplianceoftheorderdated 07.12.2012,theappealagainsttherespondentno.1hasbeenrejected. the appellants have filed i.a. no.6214 of 2013 with a prayer to restore the appeal against the respondent no.1 and appellants undertake that within one week they will take steps for substitutedservicesofnoticei.e.theywillfilerequisiteetc.withina periodofoneweekforitspublication. considering the submissionsandthegroundstaken,the appealagainsttherespondentno.1isrestoredtoitsoriginalfileand i.a.no.6214of2013isallowed. m.a.no. 69 of2009 the appellants are directed to file draft notice for substitutedserviceofnoticeagainstrespondentno.1withinoneweek fromtoday. officeshallreturnthesame,fixingthedate,tothecounsel appearingfortheappellant,foritspublication. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) anit

Judgment:


INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Misc.AppealNo.69of2009 SakaluOraon@Toppo&Ors. .... .... . Appellants Versus TheNewIndiaInsuranceCo.Ltd. .... .... ....Respondent CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellants :Mr.AshutoshAnand,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mrs.NishaThakur,Advocate 16/20.08.2013 I.A.No.6214of2013 Itappearsthatduetononcomplianceoftheorderdated 07.12.2012,theappealagainsttherespondentno.1hasbeenrejected. The appellants have filed I.A. No.6214 of 2013 with a prayer to restore the appeal against the respondent no.1 and appellants undertake that within one week they will take steps for substitutedservicesofnoticei.e.theywillfilerequisiteetc.withina periodofoneweekforitspublication. Considering the submissionsandthegroundstaken,the appealagainsttherespondentno.1isrestoredtoitsoriginalfileand I.A.No.6214of2013isallowed. M.A.No. 69 of2009 The appellants are directed to file draft notice for substitutedserviceofnoticeagainstrespondentno.1withinoneweek fromtoday. Officeshallreturnthesame,fixingthedate,tothecounsel appearingfortheappellant,foritspublication. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) Anit


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //