Skip to content


Anil Kumar Verma Vs. the Union of Indai Through Cbi - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Anil Kumar Verma

Respondent

The Union of Indai Through Cbi

Excerpt:


in the high court of jharkhand ranchi cr. m.p. no. 2305 of 2013 anil kumar verma ... ... ... petitioner versus union of india through c.b.i.... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. indrajit sinha for the state : mr. md. mokhtar khan, c.b.i. ........ 2/21.08.2013 this application has been filed for modification of order dated 18.03.2013 passed in a.b.a. no. 4246 of 2012. by the said order, anticipatory bail application of the petitioner rejected with liberty to raise all the points taken in the anticipatory bail application while filing regular bail application in the court below. the court below was also directed to consider said points while passing order in the regular bail application. observation given in the last paragraph of order dated 18.03.2013 in a.b.a. no. 4246 of 2012 is very much clear. thus, no clarification is required to be made. under the said circumstance, i find no merit in this application. same is accordingly dismissed. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2305 of 2013 Anil Kumar Verma ... ... ... Petitioner Versus Union of India through C.B.I.... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, C.B.I. ........ 2/21.08.2013 This application has been filed for modification of order dated 18.03.2013 passed in A.B.A. No. 4246 of 2012. By the said order, anticipatory bail application of the petitioner rejected with liberty to raise all the points taken in the anticipatory bail application while filing regular bail application in the court below. The Court below was also directed to consider said points while passing order in the regular bail application. Observation given in the last paragraph of order dated 18.03.2013 in A.B.A. No. 4246 of 2012 is very much clear. Thus, no clarification is required to be made. Under the said circumstance, I find no merit in this application. Same is accordingly dismissed. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //