Skip to content


Kalim Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Kalim Ansari

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt:


.....with coaccused mote @ kasmuddin ansari; the allegation against said kasmuddin ansari was of opening fire on the informant due to land dispute; the said coaccused, against whomtherewasspecificallegation,hasbeengrantedbailby thiscourtinb.a.no.7467of2013;thepetitionerisincustodysince november,2012withoutanycogentmaterialagainsthim;heisa localpermanentresident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedsubdivisionaljudicialmagistrate,dumkainconnection withshikariparap.s.caseno.78of2012,correspondingtog.r. no.1174of2012. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/

Judgment:


INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5942of2013 KalimAnsari. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mrs.J.K.Mazumdar,Advocate FortheState : APP 02/17.08.2013: Thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections307and34oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection27of theArmsAct. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; the only allegationagainstthepetitioneristhathewasaccompanying with coaccused Mote @ Kasmuddin Ansari; the allegation against said Kasmuddin Ansari was of opening fire on the informant due to land dispute; the said coaccused, against whomtherewasspecificallegation,hasbeengrantedbailby thisCourtinB.A.No.7467of2013;thepetitionerisincustodysince November,2012withoutanycogentmaterialagainsthim;heisa localpermanentresident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. Regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedSubDivisionalJudicialMagistrate,Dumkainconnection withShikariparaP.S.CaseNo.78of2012,correspondingtoG.R. No.1174of2012. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //