Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5945of2013 1. KhudanSao.
2. Kodan@KaranSao. .Petitioners. Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioners: Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,Advocate FortheState : APP 02/17.08.2013: Thepetitionersareaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections414and34oftheIndianPenalCode,Section30(ii)of CoalMinesActandSection33oftheIndianForestAct. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case only on suspicion; noting incriminating has been recovered from the petitioners'possession;thepetitionersarelocalvillagersandman ofmeans;othercoaccused,namely,MakunMundaandBiran MundahavebeengrantedbailbythelearnedSessionsJudge, Hazaribagh;thepetitionersarelocalpermanentresidents;there isnochanceoftheirabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioners'prayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. Regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioners,abovenamed,aredirectedtobereleased on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (rupees ten thousand),each,withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, HazaribaghinconnectionwithKeredariP.S.CaseNo.10of2013, correspondingtoG.R.No.455of2013. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/