Skip to content


Cobert Vs. New York - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

388 U.S. 443

Appellant

Cobert

Respondent

New York

Excerpt:


cobert v. new york - 388 u.s. 443 (1967) u.s. supreme court cobert v. new york, 388 u.s. 443 (1967) 388 u.s. 443 cobert v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of new york. no. 21. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; reversed. ephraim london for petitioner. frank s. hogan for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the court of appeals of new york is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice, mr. justice clark, and mr. justice brennan would affirm. mr. justice harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 443, 444

Judgment:


COBERT v. NEW YORK - 388 U.S. 443 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court COBERT v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 443 (1967) 388 U.S. 443

COBERT v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 21.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ephraim London for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 443, 444




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //