Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 21ST POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 1081 of 2013 (I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- MUHAMMED JASEEL A.P. (MINOR), AGED 1 YEARS,GVHSS,MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER ABBAS A.P.,JESNA MANZIL, PERIYA P.O,MANANTHAVADY,WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.E.C.BINEESH, SMT.M.B.SHYNI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCITON,JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 014.
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, WAYANAD,KALPETTA NORTH,PIN-673 121. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. W.P.(C). NO.1081/2013-I: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 2ND TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(b): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 3RD TEAM MEMBER BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(c): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 4TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(d): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 5TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(e): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 6TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(f): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 7TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(g): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 8TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P1(h): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 9TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. W.P.(C).NO.1081/2013-I: EXHIBIT P1(i): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 10TH TEAM MEMBER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND JOINT GENERAL CONVENOR, SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, WAYANAD REVENUE DISTRICT 2012 13. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C4/11009/2012 DTED 28 12.2012, THE CHAIRMAN APPEAL COMMITTEE. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 2ND TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(b): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 3RD TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(c): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 4TH TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(d): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 5TH TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(e): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 6TH TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P3(f): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICTE ISSUED TO THE 7TH TEAM IN THE STATE SCHOOL KALOLSVAM 2011 12. EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE REVIEW FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 2 1.2013 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC,J -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1081 of 2013 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT Petitioner was the participant in the Wayanad Revenue District School Kalolsavam in the item "Vattappattu" and secured A Grade. Aggrieved, he filed an appeal, which was rejected by Ext.P2 order. The complaint of the petitioner is that there was failure of sound system. This allegation has been examined by the appellate authority and found to be incorrect. Not only that there is absence of materials to substantiate this claim but also this writ petition is defective for non-joinder of the first prize winner, whose results will be affected any order is passed in the writ petition. For these reasons, I am not persuaded to interfere with the impugned orders. The writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ln