Skip to content


Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Vs. Ammex Ware. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

378 U.S. 124

Appellant

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

Respondent

Ammex Ware.

Excerpt:


department of alcoholic beverage control v. ammex ware. - 378 u.s. 124 (1964) u.s. supreme court department of alcoholic beverage control v. ammex ware., 378 u.s. 124 (1964) 378 u.s. 124 department of alcoholic beverage control for california et al. v. ammex warehouse co. of san ysidro, inc., et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of california. no. 919. decided june 15, 1964. 224 f. supp. 546, affirmed. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, e. g. funke, assistant attorney general and felice r. cutter and warren h. deering, deputy attorneys general, for appellants. george d. byfield for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. hostetter v. idlewild bon voyage liquor corp., 377 u.s. 324 . mr. justice black and mr. justice goldberg dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in hostetter v. idlewild bon voyage liquor corp., supra. page 378 u.s. 124, 125

Judgment:


DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE. - 378 U.S. 124 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964) 378 U.S. 124

DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEX
WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 919.
Decided June 15, 1964.

224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.

George D. Byfield for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.

Page 378 U.S. 124, 125




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //