Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Germano Vs. Kerner

Germano vs Kerner

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 560
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Germano

Respondent

Kerner

Excerpt

germano v. kerner - 378 u.s. 560 (1964) u.s. supreme court germano v. kerner, 378 u.s. 560 (1964) 378 u.s. 560 germano et al. v. kerner, governor of illinois, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 636. decided june 22, 1964. judgment reversed and case remanded. reported below: 220 f. supp. 230. bernard kleiman, lester asher, john c. melaniphy and charles s. rhyne for appellants. howard j. trienens and gary l. cowan for appellees. per curiam. the judgment below is reversed. reynolds v. sims, 377 u.s. 533 ; lucas v. forty-fourth general assembly of colorado, 377 u.s. 713 . the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in reynolds v. sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with reynolds. mr. justice clark and mr. justice stewart would affirm the judgment, because, as the opinions of judge campbell and judge schnackenberg demonstrate, 220 f. supp. 230, 235, the illinois system of legislative apportionment is entirely rational and does not frustrate effective majority rule. mr. justice harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in reynolds v. sims, 377 u.s. 533, 589 . mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 378 u.s. 560, 561

Full Judgment

GERMANO v. KERNER - 378 U.S. 560 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court GERMANO v. KERNER, 378 U.S. 560 (1964) 378 U.S. 560

GERMANO ET AL. v. KERNER, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 636.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

Reported below: 220 F. Supp. 230.

Bernard Kleiman, Lester Asher, John C. Melaniphy and Charles S. Rhyne for appellants.

Howard J. Trienens and Gary L. Cowan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 ; Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713 . The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment, because, as the opinions of Judge Campbell and Judge Schnackenberg demonstrate, 220 F. Supp. 230, 235, the Illinois system of legislative apportionment is entirely rational and does not frustrate effective majority rule.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 589 .

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 378 U.S. 560, 561



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial