Rajendra Rabidas Alias Jhupar Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment |
| Jharkhand High Court |
| Jul-23-2013 |
| Rajendra Rabidas Alias Jhupar |
| The State of Jharkhand |
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 5809 of 2013 rajendra rabidas @ jhupar petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar. for the petitioner : - mr. atanu banerjee, advocate for the state : - mr. amitabh, a.p.p. 03/23.07.2013 bail application filed by rajendra rabidas @ jhupar, is moved by sri atanu banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri amitabh, learned additional p.p. for the state. earlier the bail prayer of petitioner rejected. however, it appears from the status report that still the case is running under the heading for appearance. petitioner is in custody from 13.01.2012. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances specially period of detention, i allow this application and direct court below to enlarge the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned additional sessions judge-ii, bermo at tenughat, in connection with bokaro thermal p.s. case no. 07 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 42 of 2012 (s.t. no. 276 of 2012). ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5809 of 2013 Rajendra Rabidas @ Jhupar Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Amitabh, A.P.P. 03/23.07.2013 Bail application filed by Rajendra Rabidas @ Jhupar, is moved by Sri Atanu Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Amitabh, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Earlier the bail prayer of petitioner rejected. However, it appears from the status report that still the case is running under the heading for appearance. Petitioner is in custody from 13.01.2012. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances specially period of detention, I allow this application and direct court below to enlarge the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No. 07 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 42 of 2012 (S.T. No. 276 of 2012). ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/