Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2286of2013 Dr.NagendraPrasadSingh@NagendraPrasadSingh Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.HariNarayanMishra OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.ManishKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 03/25.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itrevealsfromthecomplaintthatthecomplainanthadadvancedloanof Rs.2lacstothepetitioner.Inordertorepaytheloanamountthepetitionerhad issuedfewchequesbutthosechequesstooddishonoured.Itisallegedthatthe petitionerwithhishenchmanhadthreatenedthecomplainantandhencethis case. Itissubmittedthatentirecomplaintisconcoctedandrealfactshavebeen suppressedbythecomplainant.Evenifentireallegationistakentobetrue,no case under Section 384 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner and other offencesarebailableinnature. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringfactsandcircumstances,abovenamedpetitionerisdirected tosurrenderbeforetheCourtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtoday andonsuchsurrenderheisdirectedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtofSriArvindKumar,learnedJ.M. 1st Class,BokaroinconnectionwithC.P.CaseNo.390of2011subjecttothe conditionslaiddownunderSection438(2)Cr.P.C. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC