Nikhil Ranjan Manjhi Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors - Court Judgment |
| Jharkhand High Court |
| Aug-13-2013 |
| Nikhil Ranjan Manjhi |
| Punjab National Bank and ors |
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 387 of 2012 nikhil ranjan manjhi .... petitioner versus punjab national bank & others ..... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. kumar sundaram for the respondents :mr. rajesh kumar i.a. no. 5494 o”09. 13.08.2013 by way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner prays for early hearing of the matter, which has been admitted about one month back on 27.6.2013 itself. the grievance of the petitioner in the main writ application is against the order of his removal from service and respondents have withheld the entire gratuity amount and the leave encashment amount . however, prayer for early hearing appears to be misconceived at this stage as the writ petition itself has been admitted in the month of june, 2013. i.a. no. 5494 of 2013 is therefore, rejected. w.p.s. no. 387 of 2012 however, respondents may consider the petitioner's request for payment of any retiral dues as claimed by him in respect of which a separate affidavit be filed on their behalf within 4 weeks. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 387 of 2012 Nikhil Ranjan Manjhi .... Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Sundaram For the Respondents :Mr. Rajesh Kumar I.A. No. 5494 o”
09. 13.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner prays for early hearing of the matter, which has been admitted about one month back on 27.6.2013 itself. The grievance of the petitioner in the main writ application is against the order of his removal from service and respondents have withheld the entire gratuity amount and the leave encashment amount . However, prayer for early hearing appears to be misconceived at this stage as the writ petition itself has been admitted in the month of June, 2013. I.A. No. 5494 of 2013 is therefore, rejected. W.P.S. No. 387 of 2012 However, respondents may consider the petitioner's request for payment of any retiral dues as claimed by him in respect of which a separate affidavit be filed on their behalf within 4 weeks. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty