Skip to content


The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Department of Industries Vs. Kohinoor Steel Pvt Ltd Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Prabir Ghosh and ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Department of Industries

Respondent

Kohinoor Steel Pvt Ltd Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Prabir Ghosh and ors

Excerpt:


inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi i.a.no.160of2013 in l.p.a.no.501of2012 thestateofjharkhand appellant versus kohinoorsteelpvt.ltd.&ors. respondents coram: hon'bletheactingchiefjustice hon'blemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar forthestate : mr.j.c.toa.a.g. forrespondentno.1 : mr.indrajitsinha,advocate 07/dated:13 th august,2013 perd.n.patel,a.c.j.: i.a.no.160of2013 1. thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredundersection5 ofthelimitationactforcondonationofdelayof32daysinfilingthisletters patentappeal.2. having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially in paragraph nos. 4,5,6,7and8,itappearsthattherearereasonablereasonsforcondonationof delayof32days.we,therefore,condonethedelayinpreferringthisletters patentappeal.3. accordingly,i.a.no.160of2013standsallowedanddisposedof. l.p.a.no.501of2012 registry is directed to enlist l.p.a. no. 501 of 2012 on the board of admissionon19thaugust,2013. (d.n.patel,a.c.j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) ajay/

Judgment:


INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.160of2013 In L.P.A.No.501of2012 TheStateofJharkhand Appellant Versus KohinoorSteelPvt.Ltd.&ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheState : Mr.J.C.toA.A.G. ForRespondentNo.1 : Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate 07/Dated:13 th August,2013 PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.: I.A.No.160of2013 1. ThepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenpreferredunderSection5 oftheLimitationActforcondonationofdelayof32daysinfilingthisLetters PatentAppeal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially in paragraph nos. 4,5,6,7and8,itappearsthattherearereasonablereasonsforcondonationof delayof32days.We,therefore,condonethedelayinpreferringthisLetters PatentAppeal.

3. Accordingly,I.A.No.160of2013standsallowedanddisposedof. L.P.A.No.501of2012 Registry is directed to enlist L.P.A. No. 501 of 2012 on the board of Admissionon19thAugust,2013. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //