Ajay Kumar Vs. Bokaro Steel Plant and ors - Court Judgment |
| Jharkhand High Court |
| Aug-13-2013 |
| Ajay Kumar |
| Bokaro Steel Plant and ors |
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 1265 of 2011 ajay kumar .... petitioner versus bokaro steel plant & others ..... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. a.k.sahani for the respondents :mr. amit kr. verma i.a. no. 5420 o”02. 13.08.2013 by way of instant i.a. petitioner seeks an early date of hearing. according to the petitioner though he has been reinstated pursuant to the award with 50% back wages but other consequential benefits arising out of m.o.u executed with the respondent- management dated 6.3.2001 is not being granted. petitioner is due to retire in july, 2015. however, on the aforesaid reasons itself no ground for early hearing is made out in the instant i.a. as the substantial relief as already been granted to the petitioner whereby he has been reinstated in the service with 50% back wages. rest of the grievances of the petitioner would be decided at the time of hearing of the writ application at its usual course. i.a. no. 5420 of 2013 stands rejected. list this case in its usual course. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 1265 of 2011 Ajay Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Bokaro Steel Plant & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani For the Respondents :Mr. Amit Kr. Verma I.A. No. 5420 o”
02. 13.08.2013 By way of instant I.A. petitioner seeks an early date of hearing. According to the petitioner though he has been reinstated pursuant to the award with 50% back wages but other consequential benefits arising out of M.O.U executed with the respondent- Management dated 6.3.2001 is not being granted. Petitioner is due to retire in July, 2015. However, on the aforesaid reasons itself no ground for early hearing is made out in the instant I.A. as the substantial relief as already been granted to the petitioner whereby he has been reinstated in the service with 50% back wages. Rest of the grievances of the petitioner would be decided at the time of hearing of the writ application at its usual course. I.A. No. 5420 of 2013 stands rejected. List this case in its usual course. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty